Attitudes and
perceptions about science are powerful motivators working for or against
student achievement. According to research, students who enjoy science are more
apt to do well and take advanced courses. Similarly, students who dislike or fear
science and doubt their own competencies are more likely to do
poorly and boycott science altogether by late high school.
Negative
attitudes about science are learned, not inherited. Any parent
can describe the delight little children take in observing the world around them and experimenting with its limits. Yet
somewhere in the elementary grades, these positive attitudes wither or
find outlets apart from the subject in school
called "science." By the end
of third grade, almost half the students in one survey said they would
not like to take science, and by the end of eighth grade, only one-fifth had
positive attitudes toward science.
Enthusiasm about science—and with it
confidence—tends to dwindle as students progress through school.
Several
incorrect or damaging perceptions can fuel negative attitudes about
science. One is that success in
science stems from innate ability more than from effort, and that some students are just not cut out for this
"hard" subject. This attitude
is particularly pernicious for girls
and minority students. Another is that
scientists—and top science
students—are eccentrics or "nerds."
Some students show
indifference to science to keep their status with peers who do not view science
achievement as "cool."
How do
attitudes and perceptions about science take root? Often they grow out of explicit or subliminal messages students pick up in and out of school, from teachers, peers, parents, books, the media, and authority figures.
Students can sense if teachers or parents
themselves are insecure with science. Sometimes parents or teachers developed
negative attitudes about science when they were young, because they were taught by traditional methods that dampened their interest.
The methods by which science is
taught in most schools continue to affect
student attitudes today. In one survey,
21 percent of students cited teachers as the reason they liked science;
on the flip side, one-third cited
instructional factors—such as too much lecturing—as reasons they disliked
science. When science is taught as a tedious inventory of facts
and theories, it is no wonder students begin to perceive science as dull
and complicated.
In addition, instruction that
overemphasizes competition can produce early experiences of failure, which in
turn can breed a dislike for science and a lack of confidence about future
success. Similarly, teachers may subtly transmit their expectations about what
students can and cannot do so that students internalize them. Negative attitudes
can have long-term consequences, such as students foreclosing their options in
a subject they believe they have little hope of mastering anyway. The good news
is that attitudes can be changed through teacher and parent modeling and
through more engaging instruction.
No comments:
Post a Comment